Were any spirometry tests given? Were you using supplemental oxygen 24/7 prior to treatment? If you had spirometry testing pre treatment, when will you be evaluated again?
I don't know of many clinics that would guarantee treatment. Most are too savvy for that. I can count on one hand however, the number of patients who have stated on this forum that they have gotten off of supplemental oxygen and have been able to stay off of it. In fact, I can probably count on one hand and not use the thumb or the pinky finger to keep track. My big question to doctors is why? If stem cells can reduce inflammation to a point that oxygen saturation levels rise (and I would guess that is where you are at now since there is no way your lungs could be regenerating in a week), then why aren't patients able to achieve better diffusion and get off of oxygen?
That brings us back to the importance of doing some legitimate studies/clinicals and unfortunately no one wants to do any. I have been down the road too many times. Some experiences were good, some bad. Some doctors nice, some not so nice. I have been pleased with my improvements after some treatments and I have been very unhappy at setbacks after lousy treatments. I do think stem cell therapy will play a role in the future of medicine, but for many diseases, I think there will also be a role for gene therapy and pharmaceuticals in conjunction with it.
In the meantime, clinics will continue to rake in patients who quite rightfully are seeking a solution to their health problems without any proof that the treatment works. If you feel good, then that is what matters in the end, but for some people (and maybe this includes you, I don't really know), these treatments are a major financial sacrifice. Anecdotal evidence just isn't good enough. If treatments are as great as the clinic websites say they are, then where is the proof?
I don't know of many clinics that would guarantee treatment. Most are too savvy for that. I can count on one hand however, the number of patients who have stated on this forum that they have gotten off of supplemental oxygen and have been able to stay off of it. In fact, I can probably count on one hand and not use the thumb or the pinky finger to keep track. My big question to doctors is why? If stem cells can reduce inflammation to a point that oxygen saturation levels rise (and I would guess that is where you are at now since there is no way your lungs could be regenerating in a week), then why aren't patients able to achieve better diffusion and get off of oxygen?
That brings us back to the importance of doing some legitimate studies/clinicals and unfortunately no one wants to do any. I have been down the road too many times. Some experiences were good, some bad. Some doctors nice, some not so nice. I have been pleased with my improvements after some treatments and I have been very unhappy at setbacks after lousy treatments. I do think stem cell therapy will play a role in the future of medicine, but for many diseases, I think there will also be a role for gene therapy and pharmaceuticals in conjunction with it.
In the meantime, clinics will continue to rake in patients who quite rightfully are seeking a solution to their health problems without any proof that the treatment works. If you feel good, then that is what matters in the end, but for some people (and maybe this includes you, I don't really know), these treatments are a major financial sacrifice. Anecdotal evidence just isn't good enough. If treatments are as great as the clinic websites say they are, then where is the proof?