Misleading Post
I contacted Daniel privately to see what the problem was as I have much respect for Drs. Steenblock and Ramirez. From what he told me, there is not much to this problem to turn it into a mountain from a mole hill. He referred to Googles as I call them, but I have listened to both sides of the story and I find the information that is given on the internet to be quite irrelevant to the type of treatment and caring that these two doctors are giving today. In fact, I recently had an experience that turned me off the media completely. I was interviewed by the Washington Post who evidently decided they wanted to ignore what I said and make up their own story. It was so poorly done that I was embarrassed and it did nothing to further stem cell therapy as our hope for the future. Daniel was told a story by a third party who saw no results after treatment with Drs. Steenblock and Ramirez. This can happen to anyone. Many on this forum have had several treatments with no results. It may have jaded the person's opinion, I really don't know. She also said she got no certificate of purity. That is her own fault then because that has to be mandatory folks when getting UC cell treatment.
Jeannine and I will also not allow this thread to disintegrate into name calling or insults and if anyone wishes to continue along those lines, take it off the forum or you will have your posts monitored. We deal in support and factual discussion on here. We do respect opinions, but Daniel's post sounded ominous and that's why I followed it up. Having talked to Dr. Steenblock for over an hour concerning issues, I am more than satisfied that he is a good doctor who cares considerably about his patients. I have received zero complaints about him or Dr. Ramirez and I get a lot of e-mail with feedback, believe me. We need pioneering doctors as much as we need pioneering patients and to post something that is vague and has innuendos is not fair. I read Daniel's blog and there is nothing there to indicate any experiences he had with these doctors. I do understand that he is pleased with ICM. I have repeatedly asked them to participate in our forum and that invitation stands, however, I have received no replies. On Dr. Steenblock's behalf, I can send him questions or concerns and receive an almost immediate reply. It is something that I appreciate. I have no qualms about giving him or Dr. Ramirez the thumbs up.