Living Wills, Medicare/Medicaid, Hospice & The Euthanasia Society

[Jan]

Living Wills, Medicare/Medicaid, Hospice & The Euthanasia Society

The top level policymakers, most of them unelected, have decided that people will die in hospice or palliative care units, and that they will be pushed into hospice through a wide variety of means. Researchers at Duke University found that hospice reduced Medicare costs in 2009 at about $3.6 billion. With the baby boomers aging, imagine the increase in “cost savings” for the government as hospice doubles in the years to come.

If patients are hurried along toward death, the savings skyrocket. Obama Care’s cost savings will come from the baby boomers being euthanized quickly rather than being treated for illnesses, chronic or otherwise, at the end of their lives. Not only is this part of the United Nations Agenda 21 plan of population reduction, but this will rid America of those who still remember what this country was founded on and our God given rights. We are considered “useless eaters.” The plan is a fait accompli.

The above is taken from Part 6 at link below.

Read Part 1: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/02/killing-us-softly-part-1/

Read Part 2: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/02/killing-us-softly-geisinger-hospital-model-is-future-of-obamacare/

Read Part 3: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/02/killing-us-softly-hospice-palliative-care/

Read Part 4: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/killing-us-softly-the-legacy-of-elisabeth-kubler-ross/

Read Part 5: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/killing-us-softly/

Read Part 6: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/killing-us-softly-living-wills-medicaremedicaid-hospice-the-euthanasia-society/

Read Part 7: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/killing-us-softly-euthanasia-policy-makers-those-who-fund-it/

 

[Bobcat]

This is frightening stuff and I have to tell you I believe it. I've been reading quite a few articles lately stating that there aren't enough of the younger generation who will be employed to support the aging population. The easiest way to get rid of the sick and elderly is to not provide them with medical care they need.

The Democrats that wanted socialized medicine will someday wake up to the fact that their leaders and other wealthy individuals who they often demonize will not be affected. Those that can afford care will be able to get it. Those who can't will be quietly eliminated. This isn't a political viewpoint, it's reality. Without the Democrats to support the Affordable Care Act, it would not be the law.

I would like to know why a law with the purpose of insuring several million uninsured was forced on an entire population of over 300 million. Personally, I would have voted to just give each of the uninsured a million dollars and be done with it. Instead, this plan is most likely going to cost several trillion dollars, not to mention the possibility of substandard care and doctor shortages.

 

[Jeannine]

I have witnessed this treatment of several family members in recent years.

They give them increased doses of morphine to "ease the pain" until the dosage is high enough to stop their breathing.

There is less respect for the sick and elderly in the younger generation. The comments I have seen posted are quite shocking.

Funny how I never minded paying for these programs for my grandparents and now my parents yet the selfish self-centered little brats we've raised feel it is a waste of their money to care for their elderly.

It is a failure of society when it loses its respect for it frailest members.

 

[barbara]

There is a lack of respect I agree. I argue with many in academia all the time. Talk about a selfish lot. They are the ones I deal with most frequently who oppose access for the terminally and chronically ill to their own stem cells. They claim that there are too many unknown risks at this point and yet there is no evidence of that. These barbarians have no idea what it's like to be sick. Just exactly how does the risk of autologous stem cell therapy equal the risk of a fatal disease? These same learned researchers are the ones who supposedly are the brightest we have and yet they don't understand that?
It's not all researchers, but it is a majority of those I run across in discussion groups who seem to be putting themselves out there as industry spokespeople. A lot of them are younger and all I can say is God help them if they ever become ill.

 

[LLL6521]

This reminds me of an old movie with Charleston Heston called Soylent Green. The old are killed and made into cookies by the government.