FDA takes on Lasik treatment. Read this while you eat a bowl of Cheerios.
Here's another one that gains my Johnny Come Lately award. Cheerios, move over, the FDA is cleaning their closets and now they are going to get tough on those that promote and perform Lasik surgery. This action comes over a year after a public meeting was held. Now, that's some fast action if I ever saw it. My hibernating tortoises can move out quicker than that. I'll just bet the American Academy of Opthalmology physician's group appreciated the reminder. About as much as they would appreciate a black eye (no pun intended). I am seriously dismayed that the FDA is taking so long to react to patient complaints. What are they doing? Of course, some of the big boys were spared as you will read. And as for Lasik not being a miracle, I guess I would have to say it is to me. It's all in how you define miracle. I was legally blind when I went to Canada to have laser surgery done on both of my eyes. That procedure is somewhat different from the Lasik procedure performed today, but I am so happy that I had it done. I could see clearly again and didn't need to hassle with contact lenses or glasses. Having poor vision can actually be dangerous if one is in any type of accident (fire, car wreck, etc. where glasses or contacts may be lost). I literally could not see anything but blurs. Thank you Canada for giving me years of good vision before the U.S. got around to approving it. I regress, but I am getting very upset about the bumbling idiocy that seems to be taking place at the FDA. There is no excuse for taking over a year. This has happened with dangerous drugs as well. It will be catastrophic in terms of lives if the FDA gets away with declaring our own stem cells to be drugs. Join ASCTA today. We can't let this happen.
www.safestemcells.org
By Susan Heavey
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Doctors, clinics and others promoting corrective eye surgery known as LASIK need to make sure their advertisements tell consumers about possible risks, U.S. regulators said in a letter released on Friday.
The Food and Drug Administration, which has been investigating patient complaints over the procedure, told healthcare providers that commercials and other promotions that do not convey necessary warnings, side-effects and other precautions are deceptive.
"Advertising and promotional materials for FDA-approved lasers used during LASIK procedures must be truthful, properly substantiated and not misleading," wrote Timothy Ulatowski, head of the Office of Compliance for the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
The letter comes more than a year after the FDA held a public meeting that drew dozens of unhappy patients who complained of blurriness, double-vision, depression and other problems after undergoing LASIK, or laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis.
Surgeons and other industry groups said the procedure is safe and effective when done properly and that most patients are satisfied with their vision afterward.
LASIK involves cutting a flap in the eye and then using a laser to reshape the cornea, aiming to improve patients' vision so they can avoid glasses or contact lenses. About 700,000 Americans have undergone the procedure since it was approved in 1998, industry estimates have shown.
The FDA's letter spares LASIK-related companies which could have been hurt by stricter action, including device makers Abbott Laboratories' unit Abbott Medical Optics Inc, Alcon Inc, and Bausch & Lomb as well as clinics such as TLC Vision Corp and LCA Vision Inc.
A weak U.S. economy has already dampened demand for the elective surgery, which can cost several thousand dollars per eye and is not covered by most health insurers.
The FDA splits oversight of LASIK advertising with the Federal Trade Commission, which could not be immediately reached for comment. If the FDA deems LASIK advertising misleading, it can issue warning letters as well as take stronger action such as imposing fines or making referrals for criminal investigation.
But Diana Zuckerman, president of National Research Center for Women & Families, said the FDA could have done more than send a "vague" letter that does not help "patients in any meaningful way.
"The problem is there are certain people who are unlikely to benefit (from LASIK) and they don't know who they are," she said. "At this point many people think LASIK is some kind of miracle ... and that's just not true."
The agency should instead require doctors and clinics to give potential patients a simple, easy-to-understand booklet that lays out all the possible risks, Zuckerman said.
FDA spokeswoman Mary Long said the agency has taken additional steps, including updating its website and making it easier for people to report problems to the FDA.
The American Academy of Ophthalmology physicians' group said it appreciated the "reminder" from the FDA and would give the letter to its members. Other industry groups either could not be immediately reached or had no comment.
